This blog will be the last (with the exception of reposts of our regular Slaw column) in the Access Revolution series for the time being, as we focus on fundraising to save NSRLP and try to secure its future.

This is not a step we take lightly, or with pleasure – it’s a hard choice we decided we must make this year. Here’s why.

For the last 8 years, we have stitched together a multitude of small project grants to keep going, and even expanding. We have been very successful at this – most of these grants were written at my kitchen table, fueled by the expertise and creativity of first Sue Rice, then Dayna Cornwall and Moya McAlister, and always backed by the energy of our team of law student research assistants.

But it’s exhausting. And we want to do more for Access to Justice for self-represented people, which is difficult when we spend all our time writing grants and creating pitches to funders. NSRLP needs core funding, and that is hard to find. But we are determined to find a way forward.

We also need a new Director, as I have left the University of Windsor (as you know, left, not retired) and am working pro bono for NSRLP now. I shall always be here in the background, but NSRLP needs funding not only to continue the work of our professional staff and student research assistants, but also to fund at least a part-time Director.

NSRLP needs about $270,000 a year. It’s really not very much for what we do. And some of it we can generate from contracts and project grants each year – but not all.

What would the Canadian A2J landscape look like without NSRLP?

When NSRLP was created in 2013, on the heels of the National SRL Study – which for the very first time asked system users why they were coming to court without lawyers – it burst onto the justice scene in Canada as the first and only organization advocating for Access to Justice for self-represented litigants.

We knew then that more and continuous research was needed to understand the self-rep phenomenon, the biggest change in the legal system in 150 years. Since then, NSRLP has produced a welter of research reports – 12 more, in fact – on topics ranging from new developments in case law affecting SRLs, to our regular SRL Intake Reports, to our focused research on topics like the use of summary judgements against SRLs, and the difficulties of obtaining a transcript across Canada.

We have created and updated 13 SRL “Primers” (about to be 15) that are used across Canada and the US to guide self-reps through their challenging journey.

More recently, NSRLP has become the go-to for courts, tribunals, and other organizations looking for user feedback on new processes and procedures, many designed specifically with the needs of SRLs in mind. Our National SRL Database (you can sign up here) contains the details of over 1,000 SRLs who are willing to provide detailed feedback on new legal tech apps, new legal service delivery models, new court and tribunal processes, forms, procedures, and more. This is a unique resource in Canada which is allowing innovation to be grounded in user evaluation and modified/enhanced as a result.

Building a future for NSRLP

All this, and more, is at risk if we cannot secure the future – or at least the next few years – of the NSRLP.

We have already made a big difference. In 2013 SRLs were widely seen by other justice system players as deranged people who were messing up the smooth functioning of justice in the courts with their wild claims.

Today negative attitudes persist in some quarters, but we have come a long way. There is widespread acceptance that if people cannot afford lawyers, they will represent themselves. Not because they want to but because they have no other choice. Especially if life-changing decisions are at stake about their families, their income, their futures, and their rights.

But there is so much more work to be done. More SRL Primers and other resources, more raising awareness, educating judges, lawyers, and law students about the realities of the SRL phenomenon and how to build better, fairer systems. More users at the table to discuss policy and procedural changes that work for them, and not just the legal professionals.

The growing work being done to increase legal literacy by public legal education societies is very important, and NSRLP frequently collaborates with these agencies. Pro bono initiatives to assist SRLs are growing, but as I have often said, these will not fix the problem long-term without system change.

Canada needs NSRLP to go on doing what it has done since 2013: moving the needle on attitudes and awareness, standing up for SRLs, pressing for their inclusion in developing new processes, and drawing supportive legal professionals into our campaign for Access to Justice.

How can you help?

NSRLP is in the process of becoming a registered charity, but in the meantime, you can get a tax receipt for your donation from the University of Windsor if you use this link:

https://representingyourselfcanada.com/donate/

And if you know a rich person who might be feeling philanthropic, tell them about NSRLP (seriously).

We believe that NSRLP should be funded by government, because we are doing essential work in a unique way. Please tell your MP or MPP, provincial Attorney-General, or provincial Legal Aid Board about the work of NSRLP.

If you sit on the board of any foundations or charities that we have not yet applied to (!), please talk to them about supporting NSRLP’s work.

And finally, please share this blog with your followers on social media and get the word out.

NSRLP will not survive long-term without sustained, core funding. We hate to shutter this blog, which is an important point of connectivity among justice system stakeholders invested in Access to Justice, including SRLs. But it takes a lot of staff energy, and we’ve made the hard decision that we must prioritize our long-term survival.

You, our readers, have been so extraordinarily supportive over the years that we feel confident you’ll understand. And we hope very much that the Access Revolution Blog can come back full force in the future! If you hope to see that happen as we do, please spread the word far and wide: the NSRLP does what no other organization, and no government, does – and it’s in danger.

15 thoughts on “What would a world without the NSRLP be like?

  1. Judy says:

    This made me cry. Its like when you find a space or food or something that works
    and you take for granted that it will be there
    and one day, it gone…
    One thing we all know is if we let this happen, it is highly unlikely to re-emerge
    The other thing we know, is If the legal system really cared about SRL’s it would fund this work
    Without active eyes on, SRL’s will be at even higher risk of having the system fail us
    The legal system is and will always be a critically important touch stone in modern life
    a visible or invisible force determining many of the most important things that happen to us
    that is not remotely however; by the people, for the people
    We all know it is not working for us
    NSRLP is one of the few entities inspiring those within to evolve
    make no mistake that the loss of this momentum will reverberate far and wide and fall silent like before when SRL’s were the stuff of folklore and bad jokes
    NSRLP has invitation us to help shape a more humane future for this country and everyone who lives here
    For all NSRLP did for me, I pledge to do all I can for NSRLP

    1. NSRLP says:

      This is so kind, and moving – thank you so much for your ongoing support Judy.

  2. Abdrew says:

    Sad reality. Nevertheless, I will keep supporting your initiative.

    1. NSRLP says:

      Thank you so much Andrew, we appreciate your support!

  3. Cynthia Eagan says:

    Just made my donation.

    I appreciate the NSRLP’s work getting the word out to SRLs that they are NOT alone–it is a phenomenon. That takes compassion.
    I appreciate the NSRLP’s work within the legal profession. That takes courage.

    I am impressed by the NSRLP’s ongoing research.
    I sure wish money wasn’t such an issue.
    Onward.

    1. NSRLP says:

      Cynthia, thank you so, so much.

  4. Allen says:

    This is sad! Guys we cannot let NSRLP go down because of lack of money. It is like when we go to court and get dollared out by those with money. We need to gather together and do something. NRSLP was there for us when no one else was. We need to be there now. SO lets come back here with a plan in about a week’s time How say you? During the upcoming week, let us put the word out to those we know and even the politicians. I would rather we not rely on political dollars for he who pays the piper calls the tune, but right now we can do that until we have better footing.
    So let’s touch base here next week. Does anyone live in Toronto St Paul? Their MPP is Jill Andrew and I think she will be very receptive to something like this but usually only St Paul residents get by her office. Outsiders may get by but not easily or quickly

    1. NSRLP says:

      Allen thank you so much for your support, this is truly heart-warming for us. If it would be helpful for us to provide blurbs, information, etc., please let us know – representingyourself@gmail.com.

      1. Allen says:

        Yes it would help. It is taking a bit longer to make the connections I want ask for help. COVID has really put some of us in jail-like situations. I plan to direct those whose attention I get to the video that was used in court and anything else you can provide such as information blurbs etc will certainly be helpful. Even before this came out, I tried to direct one MPP to your work but the assistant in her office confiscated the communique. I am not going to stop trying though. NSRLP is not going down like this

        1. NSRLP says:

          Great thanks Allen! Can you email us at representingyourself@gmail.com? Thank you.

  5. Shahid says:

    It’s a sad reality of the Canadian Justice system. The closing of the blog indifference of the government that does want SRL to raise their vices and the situation reflects the true picture of of SRL representing themselves for lack of funds. The general public should come forward to raise their voices together before their provincial and federal representatives to do some thing regarding this issue which has become a number 2 issue after housing. It’s the government basic duty as reflected in the bill of rights and the constitution to protect their right and to provide them with fair, transparent and Justice system for all. The Justice system should not be unequal, unfair and non-transparent which can provide Justice to all irrespective of their status as enshrined in the charter and constitution. The Canadian Justice system has fundamental flaws which is dependent on the single judge regime- summary trial which renders judgments with palpable and overriding mistakes those are condoned and ignored for the notion of brotherly/ sisterly errors against the SRLS in the court of appeal system. Thus the judicial system is losing credibility amongst the general public who happens to be in the court system.

    1. Allen says:

      Good idea but we have to spread the word especially we have to tell our elected representatives about NSRLP’s work and how much we depend on it

  6. Sorry to hear this. If we can provide logistical support, let me know.

    1. NSRLP says:

      Thank you Omar, we will!

  7. M. Holzbauer says:

    Best way to describe Canada’s justice system;

    The Challenges We Face- by the Right Honorable Beverly McLachlin, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada; given on March 8, 2007 to the Empire Club of Canada. 4 pages long with reference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *